The Democratic Party now has a solid majority in both houses of Congress and the executive in the person of President Obama. Now they have the opportunity to expand the pro-abortion than ever before. Elections have consequences and this is one that easily predicted before the 2008 elections.
What are the problems with abortion? What does the Constitution say about abortion? When does life begin? What kind of government we have? Whatwould happen if Roe v. Wade is repealed? What is "choice"? Why not just let go and leave things as they are and we do nothing? What to do if you oppose a national abortion policy and abortion, in particular, and large federal government in general?
The Declaration of Independence states that certain rights are endowed by their Creator and Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Note the order of these inalienable rights included. The foundersfathers believed that these rights are granted by God and not man, and apply and guaranteed to all. Life is the first essential that the liberty or the pursuit of happiness. Freedom is more important than the pursuit of happiness. This only makes sense in life is more important than freedom, and freedom is more important than the pursuit of happiness. You must live to be free, and free to pursue happiness. I think many in America today sets out in search of happiness first, butwithout life and liberty, the pursuit of happiness will be taken soon. Amendment 14 to the SU Constitution assigns the following rights as due process before the government may again be the life, liberty and property, the record order.
The Constitution describes our political system as a government of laws, unlike the rule of men. To govern means to restrict, so we have a limited government. This means that a person is free to do whatever they want unless there is a lawWho says you can not. With a government of men, then a person can only do what the law allows. If there is no law that says you can wear shorts in summer, would be illegal. I hope I have explained how a free society should be based on a government of laws.
It also requires our governments the power and responsibility are divided into three distinct branches that unique powers and responsibilities. The branches would be able to check and balance each otherbranches. The legislative power, Congress is responsible for writing, discuss and enact a law or the law. Congress is also the control of taxes and spending all the money. The executive, the president and his government are responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws Congress passes. The judiciary, the judiciary, is responsible for the interpretation of laws and the constitution. For example: Congress passes a tax law, the executive who works for the IRS tax compliance, whichrevenue to the Congress to spend, and the court to interpret the questions on the law, and if it is a constitutional right. At least that's the way it was intended to work until the substantive due process and the integration of content doctrine invented by the Supreme Court.
The Constitution says nothing about abortion per se. Regardless of the Warren Supreme Court in the Constitution is the result of "substantive due process" in which a right not specificallylisted, was distracted by the word "freedom" in Amendment 14. Remember that "freedom" was named after the "life" in Amendment 14. In fact, the whole idea of substantive due process arises from this interpretation of the word "freedom" open ", which allows the judge, in fact, dictate the freedoms we have eight. If this sounds scary, should be 9. People all over the non-elected world to life, which dictate the freedom we have is scary. Remember, it is assumedinterpret laws and not to run or lay down the law.
Although this sounds logical and acceptable to some, it bypasses the process of constitutional amendment, the judiciary and gives the right to legislate what they think their rights. This process was originally designed to further protect the individual against the state in which the states could not justify a person of life, liberty or property by simply following the process of the law, but instead was a justification fordo. In fact, lead the Supreme Court to challenge the doctrine of substantial integration that allows the judge to decide whether to do whatever feels his fundamental rights to the states and force them to adopt. This has given the unprecedented power of the Supreme Court literally write the legislation and to impose duties reserved for the other two branches of government.
A fair trial before the substantive due process was only a procedural due process in the sense that the Courtthe government the authority of the Constitution, specifically following the procedures set out in substantial due process and the resulting integration is essentially a violation of the doctrine of absolute separation of powers doctrine enumerated in the Constitution. Strangely, although this power is granted to the judiciary, the judiciary, because they are the ones who were initially charged with interpreting the Constitution. This is an uncontrolled use of power, another violation of controls andbalances put in the Constitution. The legislature and the executive would have to cooperate with the States of an amendment to this abuse of power by the courts the final pass. The court may put an end to the practice and on their own. None of these seems likely, because it has not happened, and almost all the members to control the three branches of government knows exactly what I just explained.
The idea was difficult for the Constitution, a document for changeallows the government to a limited control over our lives. An amendment to pass both houses, signed by the President and subsequently passed by three-quarters of state legislators in a given period of time. Note: the involvement of state legislatures in this process. The founders knew all too well that states were more representative of the people, and involvement in granting the federal government more authority. This circumvention of the stream Constitutionlines of the government's ability to more vigorously. Substantive due process has often been in the mid 60's and the federal government has grown at a rapid pace, with more rights of States, as more and more control and freedom of us as individuals since then.
Why is it important? In our system of government, the federal government is less representative of the people. The state government is much more accessible to local people andgovernment even more. There is only one representative in Congress for about every 500,000 citizens, but most people know that their alderman and alderman, or at least easy access to them. A mood of the people is much more impact on state and local level than it is for the federal government. The person's voice is a voice on how their government should serve. Remember that the government should serve you, not vice versa.
If the federal government grows, andencourages the concept of growth we need to serve the public, I wonder how long before becoming a government of men. If such control over our lives can do with a problem, certainly will do with other issues.
Candidate during the campaign Obama was asked when he thought life began. His response was that the problem was above all his pay grade. And 'one who did not know if he did not want to answer. Make your choice. In reality, scienceidea of when life begins. I do not know for sure. My faith tells me that life begins at conception, but the first adaptations of freedom of religion clause means that you are not my faith, to share your nor I, nor the government establish a religion.
Surely a baby being born, has life. The child is born to be a conscious man, this is not a scientific or common sense, and if the child were born and died, a murder would have beencommitted, regardless of which State action has taken place in. In fact, that child is clearly a human being can survive outside the womb for the last full quarter. With no arguments, a unique life exists, does not require faith to believe this, and medical science says. late term and partial birth abortions are the adoption of human life, and in fact were not allowed in the decision Roe v. Wade, but changed by this decision because of meritprocess.
During the second quarter, 4-6 months of pregnancy, the child is a human being easily recognizable, but usually can not survive outside the womb, the child has a unique DNA, muscles and autonomic nervous system activity of mothers , a mind, feelings, and the ability to respond to external stimuli. This is independent of responding only to external stimuli is sufficient for science to recognize that this organism is alive, andappearance and genetic makeup are unique to humans.
Abortion is murder at this time of life, and there are scientific and logical arguments.
From conception to the end of the first three months, many changes. When has life in this process? Fertilization of eggs? The implant in the uterus wall? After the appearance of bodies and brains, when the heart starts beating? I do not know and not alldifferent.
Since we do not know I think the largest we have encountered on the side of life. Maybe someday there will be a definitive point that life begins, that does not depend on faith or pure speculation, but until then we must err on the side of life. The Constitution requires that we do in this life is the primary law declared inalienable.
If Roe v. Wade were repealed or a constitutional amendment was approved the other way, then the decision about the return of state and localGovernment, back to the unit of government that much more representative of their constituents. Certainly a number of states allow abortions, and many others. Many places would limit abortions in their jurisdiction. Women should not be forced into alleys for abortions, but would have to travel or reside in a jurisdiction which they are allowed. At least the decision should be accessible to elected officials and a handful of judges whoappointed rather than elected.
The most frightening question is what happens if we do nothing and leave things as they are. Now the government, under the control of liberal Democrats, the Freedom of Choice Act, which among other things, requires all hospitals and doctors, even those of faith, who now refuse to perform abortions in order to perform abortions. It will even partial birth abortions and late when the baby is viable, but unborn children do notreasonable scientific arguments can be made against the life of some there.
So what is "choice?" Short and his purest form, the choice is an act of making the elections rather than another, instead of vanilla to chocolate to get them to do "A" instead of "B". Regarding the above subject, the pro-abortion label themselves "pro choice" and support their arguments with statements like "the woman has a right to choose." These words sound more noble pro-abortion, and athe right of women to kill their unwanted children. In fact they are ignoring the truth that the woman did not make good choices, so they want more choices to get rid of the annoying consequences.
We all know what it takes to get pregnant. Leaving aside the rape, the woman has the right to choose whether they wish to participate in this behavior, and if they want to do it without any protection. She and her partners are fully aware of the implications of thisirresponsible behavior.
Since we do not know when life begins, we must assume that the child is still alive. Of course, we as civil society would have given the innocent, because it is presumed innocent of those charged with a crime until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. What the public wants abortion to the right to kill another person, for convenience, since the child would have been difficult for the mother. People accused of a crime to be sentenced to areasonable doubt before being convicted and their lives, freedom or property (excluding taxes), the risk of the government. There is no logical argument that says that we know scientifically when life begins for a child to a preponderance of probability in the second two quarters, and beyond a reasonable doubt the entire pregnancy.
Suppose you see someone choking, and saving their lives with the Heimlich maneuver. Nothing says it must act to save their lives, but onceyou choose to do this, you have no right to kill later, just because you can overload your life in a certain way.
What happens if we do nothing? What if the silent majority remain silent? We have not reached this point during the night. This has been a gradual process of enlargement of federal powers on due process, and against abortion and the rights of life, Roe v. Wade. We started in a way that the federal government canstate of force and local governments to be in the first quarter of abortions. Now, with the freedom of choice law, if approved, the request of the Federal Government for all physicians and hospitals to perform abortions at all stages of pregnancy. If this happened under the Roe v. Wade decision, he never accepted by the Member or the politicians of the time. But gradually expanding the "right" to abortion and make it more socially acceptable through film, literature andpolitical discourse, we come to this. We started with a road kill for convenience. Some warn that this path will lead to the killing of the elderly or disabled or deformity in one day. I do not know when that day would come. Learning from history, I know two things. If we continue on this road, the day that they kill more people than the unborn child to be comfortable. If you stay on a road long enough to get to your destination. If you get to leave, you will never reachit. I would not go to a destination of a society that kills people, because they are inconvenient to reach. In one day we will all be somewhat uncomfortable.
History shows that we can achieve this goal very quickly. In less than a decade, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party believed that the people of Germany to demonize the Jews. They accused the Jews all their economic problems, and soon labeled as sub-human. Not all people of Nazi Germany wanted the Jews to kill, butMany stood and did nothing when the Nazis rounded up and they finally killed 6 million because they were attacked. The Jews were not the only ones who suffer from this, many Catholics were captured and killed. If you had told a German citizen in 1930 his government would do this, would never have believed it.
Now do not kill Jews, but we are killing millions more children. In comparison, the number of aborted babies walk as Hitler and the Nazis. Ifbelieve that abortion is killing human life, then you are not alone and leave. What do we do?
When a position? When we raise our voices that killing is wrong on the facility. This problem is all this becomes reality, people want abortion because having a child because of their irresponsible behavior is difficult. Abortion would only reinforce the behavior by removing the consequences.
Our system of governmentprovides for the peaceful revolution every election cycle. We are able to run for office or support and vote for those who see the government as we do. With the support I intend to buy campaign ads, walk in parades, and all other legal means to support them. Supporting means, if you are a person of faith, to pray for our candidates and office holders in progress on a daily basis, for them to do the right things.
We need to request the Court of Cassation, the President and Congressabolition of the practice of the process substantially. We must ask our candidates for office, and requires, as soon as they are elected. In this context, a letter, e-mail and telephone campaign, and maintained. They worked in government for 29 years, I know that the squeaky wheel gets the grease. They only do something to stop bullying them.
Economy and society is ordered, and the current economic situation in many placescompanies on the brink of survival. Many companies support the political and policy issues. The pro-life groups such as churches, right to life, and every organization needs to publish on websites, lists of companies who support our candidate and this particular problem, so we support them with our business. Conversely, if a company supports the pro-abortion political platform, and we should not support these things, and should be madeaware. Now that may mean not buying your favorite drink, but this is a minor annoyance for us as consumers, when you realize that when these business customers, if you vote for those politicians who support abortion. Understand that support the political pro abortion and abortion-business support. Nothing to do, or support of these companies and politicians that makes us no different than the German citizens who did nothing andallow the Holocaust to continue.
For years I sat in church listening to sermons and scriptures. An increasingly turn my attention, but the time has never really appealed to me. In one of the parables Jesus told his disciples of a man who gave the measure three servants talents or money interpretation. A buried and the other two had requested them and more back to the Master. I often use the word idea "talent" has a double meaning, and for a very longI left a "talent" God gave me buried. I hope it's not too late for me to start making a return on investment that God has in me. Please accept and consider this modest attempt to mine, hope that helps save innocent lives. Any errors in this piece are mine. All relevant information is simply a return on investment that has never been my first.
Thank you for taking the time to consider this.
See Also : Common Injuries Nail Vitamins
No comments:
Post a Comment